Menu

Why I Am Revisiting Blackmagic’s Original (1080p) Pocket Cinema Camera

Sometimes the best camera for the job is the one you already own… Even if it’s 6 years old, only shoots 1080p and has since been replaced by newer iterations.

I have long been a huge fan of the Super 16 look, and there were only really ever two cameras that could scratch that itch: The Digital Bolex and Blackmagic’s original Pocket Cinema Camera.

Unlike virtually every other cinema camera out there, the Digital Bolex and Pocket Camera never chased the large sensor trend. Instead, their aim was to deliver gorgeous cinematic images with a smaller (but also more adaptable) Super 16mm sized sensor.

For filmmakers like myself who love 16mm film, this was a dream.

I’ve shot multiple projects on both the Digital Bolex and Pocket Camera and have always been blown away by the results. Both cameras (in large part due to their fantastic sensors) deliver really organic/filmic images, with a depth of field and FOV consistent with true 16mm motion picture film.

Unfortunately, both cameras are no longer in production.

Digital Bolex of course shut down years ago and Blackmagic has since released updated Pocket Cameras – in 4K and 6K flavors – which make huge technical improvements, but no longer feature a true 16mm sensor.

So as of right now in 2020, there are no new cinema cameras being manufactured that have native 16mm sensors. And that is really a shame!

As a workaround, you can shoot in a Super 16mm (equivalent) crop mode on an Arri or RED camera, but that just solves the aesthetic issue. The other consideration is practicality. 

Back in the film days, the reason 16mm was so enticing was because of the freedom it created. The cameras were smaller, lighter and more mobile. They could be used in a wider variety of shooting scenarios, and were more conducive to indie filmmakers – including those shooting guerrilla style.

This is why 16mm was so pivotal in the French New Wave movement, and in the birth of independent filmmaking more broadly.

The original Blackmagic Pocket Camera really called back that indie spirit. It wasn’t just about the image quality, but also the creative freedom that a small form factor brought to the table. 

So while Arri & RED may help cover your bases aesthetically by offering a 16mm crop, they won’t help you reduce your footprint (or your budget) in the same way.

Currently, I have a feature film in development that I aim to shoot on Super 16mm motion picture film. This is something I’ve wanted to do for a long time, but haven’t really been able to pull the trigger until now.

The film will require some run and gun insert shots that will be filmed guerrilla style on location. For many of these shots, it won’t be practical (or even possible) to shoot with my Arri SRII, so I’ll likely need to supplement the production with some digital footage. 

Ultimately this need is what has driven me back to the original Blackmagic Pocket Camera. It’s the most obvious solution for my needs, despite the camera’s age and technical limitations.

Blackmagic’s newer 4K/6K pocket cameras were certainly viable contenders as well, but there’s something about the organic look of the original Blackmagic Pocket Camera that I keep coming back to. 

It’s not a better or worse question, it’s simply a matter of which tool is best for the job. Having shot a fair amount of film at this point, I’m more confident in achieving a realistic 16mm look with the original Pocket Camera than it’s updated counterparts.

Not to mention, the reduced sensor size allows the camera’s body to remain significantly smaller – likely due to the decreased risk of overheating – which is key consideration too.

It should go without saying that obviously the updated 4K/6K pocket cameras offer a far improved user experience, more functionality and higher resolution. For many projects they would be an optimal choice for obvious reasons.

But the lesson here is that newer isn’t always better. Sometimes the best camera for any given situation is the one we already have. Just because it’s “outdated” doesn’t mean it’s no longer a viable tool.

I can’t help but wonder how many other filmmakers are longing for a current, affordable, native Super 16mm digital film camera. Maybe I’m alone on this one… But I certainly hope not.

It really feels like there is a demand out there, and if any camera manufacturers are reading this – I would urge you to consider the possibility.

There are no shortage of DSLRs and mirrorless cameras that boast Super 35 or Full Frame sensors. Those are great tools and serve an important need for many filmmakers… But they don’t fill the void left by Digital Bolex and the original Blackmagic Pocket Camera.

If a current digital 16mm camera existed, I’d be first in line to buy one. But until that happens, I’ll happily continue to utilize the tool I already own and know can deliver the results I need. My good old BMPCC!

Are you a fan of the Super 16mm look? What would your ideal digital 16mm camera look like? Leave a comment below.

And don’t forget to follow me on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter!

About Author

Noam Kroll is an award-winning Los Angeles based filmmaker, and the founder of the boutique production house, Creative Rebellion. His work can be seen at international film festivals, on network television, and in various publications across the globe. Follow Noam on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook for more content like this!

240 Comments

  • Helpful, thanks. Between your advice and PixQuill image upscaler I finally have a process that works.

    Reply
  • I still keep my original Pocket Cinema Camera for that Super 16 look, and the fact that no new native 16mm cinema cameras exist in 2020 really hits home. Shooting guerrilla-style with that tiny body reminded me why 16mm freed the French New Wave.

    Reply
  • Revisiting the original Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera is a great reminder that impressive filmmaking depends on creativity, not just expensive equipment. for more insights and inspiration.

    Reply
  • I still regret selling my original Pocket Camera; that Super 16 sensor gave my shorts a texture the 4K version never matched. Reading that no new native 16mm cinema cameras exist in 2020 makes me want to pull mine back out.

    Reply
  • I shot a short on the original Pocket Camera and its Super 16 field of view felt closer to the 16mm films I grew up loving than any crop mode. It’s wild that no new native 16mm cinema camera exists in 2020.

    Reply
  • Advelum
    at

    I still regret selling my original Pocket Camera—its Super 16 sensor gave my indie shorts that organic 16mm feel without a crop-mode workaround. Hearing no new native 16mm cinema cameras were being made in 2020 makes me want to dig one up again.

    Reply
  • I still miss shooting on the original Pocket Camera; that Super 16 sensor gave my short films a depth of field I haven’t matched with newer large-sensor bodies. It’s sad both it and the Digital Bolex are gone.

    Reply
  • I still pull out my original Pocket Camera when I want that Super 16 field of view, so the point about no new native 16mm cinema cameras in 2020 really lands. It reminds me of shooting tiny guerrilla setups where the small body let me move fast without a crew.

    Reply
  • I still regret selling my original Pocket Camera, and your point about no new native Super 16 sensors really lands. The French New Wave comparison makes me want to dust off my old 16mm lenses and shoot something small and guerrilla-style again.

    Reply
  • I still shoot on my original Pocket 4K and people always ask why. The Super 16 sensor look is something the newer 4K and 6K models just can’t replicate, and it’s sad no one makes native 16mm cinema cameras anymore.

    Reply
  • Curbora
    at

    I still regret selling my original Pocket Camera; that Super 16 sensor gave my nighttime street shots a texture I haven’t matched since. It’s wild that in 2020 no new native 16mm cinema cameras were being manufactured.

    Reply
  • I still pull out my original Pocket Camera for that Super 16 look, and the point about no new native 16mm sensors in 2020 hits hard. That small body reminds me why 16mm gave indie filmmakers so much freedom.

    Reply
  • Image 2
    at

    I still pull out my original Pocket Camera for Super 16 projects, and that native 16mm sensor is exactly why. The point about 16mm’s freedom for guerrilla filmmaking rings true—I’ve gotten shots with that tiny body I’d never manage with a larger rig.

    Reply
  • I still regret selling my original Pocket Camera a few years back—those Super 16 images had a texture nothing in 4K matched. Hearing you mention the French New Wave makes me want to pull out my old footage and shoot something handheld this weekend.

    Reply
  • Flux 2
    at

    I still regret selling my original Pocket Camera; that Super 16 sensor gave my handheld projects a texture the newer 4K/6K models don’t quite match. It’s wild that in 2020 no new cinema camera offers a native 16mm sensor.

    Reply
  • Very helpful points covered throughout this guide. The section on “Why I Am Revisiting Blackmagic’s Original (1080p) Pocket Cinem” was especially helpful. For quick video editing without a physical green screen, removebackgroundfromvideo.com strips out video backgrounds cleanly in the browser and exports transparent WebM or MP4.

    Reply
  • Great insights shared here, especially on the workflow side. The section on “Why I Am Revisiting Blackmagic’s Original (1080p) Pocket Cinem” was especially helpful. For fellow automotive enthusiasts: unforgettablecar-ai.com takes a static photo of your car and animates it into that viral Unforgettable night-drive video clip.

    Reply
  • I’d hesitate to read the native Super 16 gap as demand. The original Pocket’s appeal could also keep people happy with used cameras.
    Disclosure of interest: I help build free receipt maker.

    Reply
  • NOAM, this is such a fascinating read! It’s great to see someone championing older tech, especially when it delivers such a distinct and beloved aesthetic. I completely agree about the magic of the Super 16 look, and it’s a real shame that true 16mm sensors are no longer a focus for new cinema cameras. Your point about the original Pocket Camera and Digital Bolex delivering such organic, filmic images really resonates. It makes me want to dust off some old gear and experiment. Thanks for highlighting why sometimes the best tool is indeed the one you already own, or perhaps one that helps you Merge Image to create something truly unique.

    Reply
  • Noam, this is such a fantastic read! It’s refreshing to hear someone championing older tech, especially when it delivers such specific, beloved aesthetics. Your point about the original Pocket Cinema Camera and the Digital Bolex truly scratching that Super 16mm itch resonates deeply. It’s a real shame that modern cameras have mostly abandoned the native 16mm sensor, despite all their technical advancements. Sometimes, the pursuit of progress overlooks the very magic that makes certain tools so special. This article makes me want to dust off some old gear and try a fresh Split Image project with that unique look you describe. Thanks for reminding us that sometimes the “best” camera isn’t always the newest.

    Reply
  • This is such a refreshing take, Noam! It’s great to see someone championing the original Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera, especially when the industry is always pushing for the latest and greatest. Your love for the Super 16 look really shines through, and I completely agree that sometimes the older tools are the best for a specific aesthetic. It’s a shame that true 16mm sensors are no longer in production for new cinema cameras, but your point about revisiting what you already own is powerful. It makes me think about how we often overlook the creative potential of existing tools, even something as simple as a Coloring Page Generator to unlock new artistic avenues. Thanks for a truly inspiring read!

    Reply
  • Noam, this is such a refreshing take! It’s great to see someone championing the original Pocket Cinema Camera and the Super 16 look. Your point about not chasing the large sensor trend really resonates; sometimes, the unique character of older gear just can’t be replicated by newer models, regardless of technical specs. I completely agree that the organic, filmic images from those cameras are something special. It’s a shame about the lack of new native 16mm sensor cameras, but it definitely highlights the enduring value of classics like the one you’re revisiting. Perhaps this spirit of appreciating unique aesthetics is why tools like an AI Cartoon Video Generator are gaining popularity, allowing creators to explore different visual styles beyond traditional limits.

    Reply
  • This is such a refreshing take, Noam! It’s easy to get caught up in the constant chase for newer, higher-res cameras, but your point about the original Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera and the Super 16 look really resonates. The unique aesthetic of those smaller sensors is truly something special and often overlooked in today’s market. It’s a shame there aren’t new native 16mm sensor cameras being made now. Thanks for reminding us that sometimes the best tool is indeed the one you already own. It reminds me of how sometimes simple tools like a square feet calculator can be just as effective as complex software for certain tasks!

    Reply
  • Noam, this is such a fantastic read! It’s so refreshing to hear someone championing older tech, especially when it delivers such a unique aesthetic. Your point about the Super 16 look and the original Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera really resonates. I completely agree – sometimes the magic isn’t in the specs, but in the specific artistic output. It’s a shame about the lack of new native 16mm sensors, but your dedication to that particular look is inspiring. Great perspective, and it makes me want to dust off some older gear and experiment! For anyone looking to celebrate unique aesthetics, check out Block Poster for more inspiration.

    Reply
  • ozil-goalai.com
    at

    Funny timing on this one — I pulled my old BMPCC out of a drawer a few months back after years of chasing bigger sensors, and this reminded me exactly why I loved it. That Super 16 character just does something the big sensor cameras don’t, and the RAW at 1080p still holds up better than people assume. Good to see the little guy getting some love again.

    Side note, since most of my shooting these days is football content: I’ve been using Ozil Goal AI to clip goal-style moments for reels and to throw together quick matchday edits for my mates, which saves me a lot of time in the edit. Reading this actually has me tempted to bring the Pocket cam to a Sunday league match and see if it gives my football clips that filmic edge too.

    Reply
  • Noam, this is such a fantastic read! It’s so refreshing to hear someone championing the original Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera and the unique Super 16 look it provides. Your points about how it and the Digital Bolex truly captured that classic 16mm feel without chasing the large sensor trend really resonate. It’s a real shame that no new cinema cameras are being manufactured with native 16mm sensors these days, as there’s definitely a niche for that specific aesthetic. It really makes you think about the value of revisiting older tech for specific creative visions, and how sometimes the tools we already own are indeed the best ones for the job. Thanks for sharing your insights and reminding us to appreciate the classics! This article is a gem. ba ii plus calculator online

    Reply
  • Nice write-up. Clear, well structured, and honest about the limitations. If anyone else is looking for an enhance HDR photos online, enhance HDR photos online is what I have been using.

    Reply
  • Appreciate the detail here. Tesla Roadster AI connects well with the Roadster AI Video Generator angle you mentioned.

    Reply
  • Totally agree that the Super 16 sensor is what makes this camera special, not a limitation to work around. I’ve held onto mine for the same reason — that organic, filmic rendering is hard to replicate even on newer large-sensor bodies. Curious whether you’re still shooting raw or leaning on ProRes for the smaller file sizes.

    Reply
  • I shot a short film on the original Pocket Camera a few years back and the Super 16 sensor really did give it that organic texture that’s hard to fake in post. What stuck with me was how the highlight rolloff handled blown-out windows in a way my newer gear just doesn’t. Your point about not chasing the large sensor trend is spot on, and honestly it’s why I still keep mine in the bag as a B-cam.

    Reply
  • Samara
    at

    Completely agree that the best camera is often the one you already own. The original Pocket Cinema Camera still has such a filmic look thanks to its sensor and ProRes/RAW options, even at 1080p. It’s refreshing to read a take that values image character over chasing specs.

    Reply
  • The point about Super 16 sensors never chasing the large-sensor trend really resonates — the Digital Bolex and original Pocket are basically the only two cameras that ever scratched that itch. I’ve also found that the 1080p limitation forces you to focus more on lighting and composition instead of leaning on resolution. Curious whether you’re still shooting in RAW or have settled into ProRes for most of your work with it.

    Reply
  • Revisiting the original 1080p Pocket Cinema Camera is a useful reminder that resolution is only one part of an image. I appreciated the focus on what this small camera can still bring to filmmaking today. Free AI Image

    Reply
  • AI font design
    at

    Really enjoyed this — it’s a good reminder— title cards, lower thirds, that sort of thing. I’ve been using AI font design to generate type treatments that match the mood of the grade, and it’s been a surprisingly useful part of finishing older projects without having to dig through the same handful of typefaces.

    Reply
  • john
    at

    Totally agree on the Super 16 appeal — the OG Pocket still has that organic texture the newer 4K/6K models smoothed out. I pulled mine out of the drawer last month and was surprised how well the 1080p ProRes holds up. Sometimes the older sensor just reads light differently.

    Reply
  • I appreciate how you highlight the original Pocket Cinema Camera’s Super‑16 sensor as the key to achieving a true 16‑mm film look, especially when you note that its smaller sensor keeps the body compact and less prone to overheating. Your point that newer 4K/6K models, while technically superior, lose that “organic” aesthetic is a useful reminder that the right tool depends on the creative goal, not just specs.

    There is a full write-up of the Malfoid meaning and origin, including the drawing that started it.

    Reply
  • bad bunny
    at

    The argument for using the original Pocket Cinema Camera for mobile inserts makes sense, especially given its Super 16 sensor. It’s great to see creators prioritizing creative goals over specs. I recently came across fnf bad bunny mod while browsing fan sites and it was a nice break from technical discussions.

    Reply
  • This was helpful. I’ve been exploring AI Video Maker lately and AI Video Maker sums it up nicely.

    Reply
  • The case for revisiting the original Pocket Camera is convincing: its smaller Super 16 sensor serves a distinct creative and practical purpose, especially for mobile, guerrilla-style inserts, even if newer models offer more resolution and features. For filmmakers planning a project around a particular visual feel, collecting image references can also help clarify the look they want. https://pinterest.com/ may be useful as a place to explore visual inspiration.

    Reply
  • Great read—really nostalgic and thoughtful! It’s rare to see such a sincere appreciation for the original Pocket Cinema Camera’s Super 16 charm. Speaking of organic, cinematic looks with indie practicality: if you love that filmic vibe but want something *instant*, try turning your own photos into raindance-style videos—no camera, no crew, just two portraits + 15 seconds of magic. Raindance AI nails the mood with its pier walk-in, close-up singing, and authentic soundtrack—all powered by Seedance 2.5. Perfect for creators who value aesthetic + accessibility. Check it out:
    raindanceai.site

    Reply
  • Great read—really nostalgic and thoughtful! It reminded me of how powerful niche tools can be, especially when they match your creative vision *exactly*. That’s why I’ve been loving AI Zombie lately: it’s not about chasing every AI trend, but nailing one specific emotional beat—the bittersweet “zombie love story”—with cinematic warmth and precision. Just upload two photos, and it generates a 12-second filmic moment: hesitation, embrace, memory. No fluff, no over-engineering—just pure, shareable storytelling. Like the original Pocket Camera, it proves sometimes the most compelling tech is the one that serves the feeling first.

    Reply
  • Great read—love how Noam highlights the enduring charm of that Super 16mm aesthetic and the indie spirit of the original Pocket Camera. It’s a reminder that sometimes “older” tech fits *exactly* what you need. Speaking of creative, accessible tools for modern creators: if you’re into viral visual trends (like the Hotel Lobby duet), check out Hotel Lobby AI—upload two photos, pick a backdrop, and get a ready-to-post 10-second vertical video in seconds. Zero editing skills required. Perfect for filmmakers, influencers, or anyone who values speed + style. First video’s free!

    Reply
  • Great read—really nostalgic and thoughtful! It’s rare to see such a sincere appreciation for the original Pocket Cinema Camera’s unique Super 16 charm. Speaking of organic, filmic looks: if you love that authentic 16mm aesthetic but want something faster and more accessible for modern workflows, check out the AI Bikini Generator—it delivers surprisingly realistic, style-consistent virtual try-ons in seconds, no studio needed. Perfect for creatives exploring visual authenticity in new ways. Try 3 free generations here:
    AI Bikini Generator

    Reply
  • Great read—reminds me how powerful intentional limitations can be in creative work. Speaking of practical, indie-friendly tools: if you’re brainstorming room designs with the same spirit of accessibility and authenticity, check out AI Room Design. It lets you generate interior, kitchen, or exterior concepts instantly from a photo or simple text prompt—no design degree needed. Private, iterative, and surprisingly nuanced in its output. Perfect for filmmakers (or anyone) who values creative control without the overhead. Try it yourself: AI Room Design

    Reply
  • The point about returning to a simple camera for its image character is compelling. I also enjoy experimenting with different portrait looks through ProfileLoom.

    Reply
  • Emily
    at

    It’s refreshing to see a discussion on the value of older, specialized gear like the original Pocket Cinema Camera. The author makes a compelling point about owning what works for you, regardless of specs. I appreciate the focus on practical use over chasing new iterations. Speaking of visual creativity, finding good perler bead patterns can sometimes inspire similar attention to detail in capturing scenes.

    Reply
  • Casino bora za mtandaoni huwapa wachezaji chaguo tofauti za burudani, ikijumuisha
    michezo za sloti, ruleti, blackjack na burudani ya moja kwa moja.

    Ukichagua casino ya kidijitali, ni muhimu kuangalia leseni yake,
    usalama wa miamala, ufanisi wa huduma kwa watumiaji na masharti
    ya ofa za ziada. Vilevile, watumiaji wanapaswa kuweka mipaka ya matumizi yao na kucheza kwa nidhamu, wakizingatia sheria na maelekezo yanayohusika katika nchi
    yao.

    Also visit my page … Ukaguzi Kamili wa Mchezo wa Aviator

    Reply
  • Eric
    at

    Great read—love how you highlight the unique charm of that original Pocket Camera’s Super 16 sensor and indie ethos. It reminds me of another kind of creative sandbox: Sandboxels.cc, a browser-based falling-sand simulator where you can experiment with 85 materials—from fire and water to circuits and plants—to build interactive scenes like volcanoes, ecosystems, or even logic gates. No installs, no paywalls—just pure, tactile physics-driven play. If you appreciate intentional constraints (like 1080p or a 16mm crop) that spark creativity, you’ll likely enjoy the focused, joyful experimentation Sandboxels offers. Worth a quick tab!

    Reply
  • Francis
    at

    Just stumbled upon GestureSynth.me — a brilliant browser-based instrument that turns hand gestures into music using local webcam tracking (no uploads, no sign-up). It’s like a theremin meets chord sequencer, with loop recording and WAV export. As someone who values tactile, expressive tools — much like Noam’s love for the organic Super 16mm aesthetic of the original Pocket Cinema Camera — I appreciate how GestureSynth prioritizes immediacy, creativity, and low-friction experimentation over technical bloat. Perfect for quick sonic sketches or teaching gesture-based interaction. Check it out:
    GestureSynth.me

    Reply
  • lisheng
    at

    Great read—love how Noam highlights the unique charm of that original Pocket Cinema Camera’s Super 16 look. It’s a reminder that sometimes “less tech” means more soul in your imagery. Speaking of intentional, organic results: if you’re editing footage (or stills) and want AI-powered restoration, relighting, or style shifts—without sign-ups or data leaks—I’ve been using ImgLoop.ai lately. It runs locally, respects privacy, and handles JPG/PNG/WebP up to 20 MB. Free to try (2 lifetime credits), with local tools costing zero credits. Perfect for indie creators who value control *and* quality.

    Reply
  • Tarot
    at

    Tarot isn’t about predicting a fixed future—it’s a mirror for the questions you’re already asking. I’ve been using the card meanings section here to deepen my daily draws, especially when I pull a reversed card and need a fresh angle. What stands out is how the spreads are laid out clearly, so you’re not just flipping cards but actually following a thread of thought. For anyone who wants to move beyond surface-level interpretations, the practical guides break down everything from Celtic Cross positions to simple three-card check-ins. If that resonates, readers can explore the full set of tools and begin their own reflective practice through our Tarot Bitio. No fluff, just a structured way to sit with your own insight.

    Reply
  • Great write-up — I bookmarked Saturn Return Calculator for reference on Saturn Return Calculator.

    Reply
  • This was a great read on revisiting the original Pocket Cinema Camera. I still keep a folder of screenshots from older shoots, and using Imagen a Texto to pull the text out locally is handy without uploading anything. Curious how you handle matching those early 1080p files today.

    Reply
  • Alice
    at

    Noam’s point about the original Pocket Cinema Camera’s Super 16 look really resonates, especially with its true 16mm sensor. It’s fascinating how an older camera can still outperform newer models for certain aesthetics. I love seeing how gear choice impacts storytelling—just like choosing a fun theme in makeover games can completely shift the vibe of a project. Great reminder that sometimes less tech is more.

    Reply
  • Bertille and Tom’s photos are such a refreshing mix of candid joy and elegant framing—the way you captured their laughter between posed shots really tells the story. It reminds me of how some couples bond over quirky daily rituals, like tackling a 12-Letter Word Puzzle together each morning. Their energy feels just as playful.

    Reply
  • I appreciate how you highlight the original Pocket Cinema Camera’s true 16mm sensor as a key factor that gives it a “Super 16 look” and a depth of field that feels genuinely filmic. Your point that this sensor size keeps the camera lightweight and affordable for guerrilla‑style shoots really underscores why the indie community still values it over newer 4K models. It’s a compelling reminder that image quality and practical freedom can coexist in a single, compact package.

    You can build a Pokemon team online and see the type gaps as you add each slot.

    Reply
  • pdfdark
    at

    This is how it’s done. Masterclass.Convert any PDF to dark mode in your browser.

    Reply
  • This answered the exact question I came here with. Nicely explained.

    Reply
  • pdfdark
    at

    The point about the smaller sensor keeping the body cooler and therefore smaller is easy to overlook — I’ve found the same benefit with fast, inexpensive MFT glass, where deeper focus genuinely helps handheld inserts. That said, 1080p ProRes and weak low light still limit delivery options, so pairing it with a film-scan pipeline makes sense. If a native Super 16 digital camera ever ships, I’d join that queue.

    Convert any PDF to dark mode in your browser.

    Reply
  • I was very impressed by this post, this site has always been pleasant news Thank you very much for such an interesting post, and I meet them more often then I visited this site.

    Reply
  • This was helpful. I’ve been exploring Make It Longer lately and Make It Longer sums it up nicely.

    Reply
  • Thanks for sharing this insightful article. Really helpful!
    RoboLibrary

    Reply
  • https://www.domainextractoronline.com
    Domain Extractor Online is an easy-to-use online resource providing useful information and convenient digital tools for visitors. Visit Domain Extractor Online to explore the website and learn more.

    Reply
  • slot 4d
    at

    This blog was… how do I say it? Relevant!!
    Finally I have found something which helped me.

    Thanks a lot!

    Reply
  • Thanks for the insights. Ai Photo Enhancer was a useful read alongside your points on AnnoraSky.

    Reply
  • This first post sets up a fascinating space for what sounds like a really creative collaboration. The idea of turning chaotic, cooperative problem-solving into a game is something I’d love to explore more. It reminds me of the tension in something like the upcoming Dear Passengers Game, where teamwork is tested by pure physics mayhem. Curious to see how you develop this theme.

    Reply
  • Solid article. Separately, I keep a hero/build reference for a co-op grinding RPG, updated after the latest patch: https://mypartyisgrinding.wiki/heroes

    Reply
  • Jim L
    at

    Thorough writeup, more than the usual pass on this topic. Off-topic, but I maintain a pricing/value reference for a Steam trading game, recently refreshed: https://fellandsell.wiki/pricing-guide

    Reply
  • Jim L
    at

    Nice writeup, thanks for the detail. Unrelated, but I’ve been documenting a new roguelite dungeon game’s arenas and mechanics on a small wiki, just posted an update: https://blood-dungeon.wiki/arenas

    Reply
  • Jim R.
    at

    Muy completo, se nota que lo revisaste bien. Aparte, mantengo una pagina con guias y codigos de un juego de Roblox de escape, por si a alguien le interesa: https://escapadelmono.com/codigos

    Reply
  • Jim R.
    at

    Appreciate the detail here, cleared up a couple things I’d been unsure about. Off-topic, but I maintain a Roblox trading-game guide covering current codes and rarity tiers, just posted an update: https://stealanegg.co/codes

    Reply
  • Jim L
    at

    Good breakdown, more careful than most posts I’ve read on this. Different subject, but I track the rarity tiers and active codes for a Roblox pet-trading game and just refreshed the page with the current list: https://stealanegg.co/codes

    Reply
  • Guest
    at

    Man, that’s rough for Mayes, but at least he’s got options. Random thought—if you’re ever trying to visualize a new backyard setup, this ai landscape design thing is pretty cool for seeing ideas on your actual space.

    Reply
  • r
    at

    Its organic Super 16mm look is truly irreplaceable for indie filmmakers. For researchers who need to document such technical setups with professional diagrams, I highly recommend using [SciDrawer](https://www.scidrawer.com) to create high-quality scientific illustrations easily.

    Reply
  • r
    at

    Great insights on the BMPCC! Its organic Super 16mm look is truly irreplaceable for indie filmmakers. For researchers who need to document such technical setups with professional diagrams, I highly recommend using [SciDrawer](https://www.scidrawer.com) to create high-quality scientific illustrations easily.

    Reply
  • Angelo L. Luiz
    at

    This content is written very well. Your use of formatting when making your points makes your observations very clear and easy to understand. Thank you. 대출디비

    Reply
  • fdjsald
    at

    ### **Great insights on the original Pocket Cinema Camera! Its organic Super 16mm look is truly irreplaceable for indie filmmakers. For more creative tools and inspiration, check out [this site](https://www.kimik3.net/). Thanks for sharing this perspective!**

    Reply
  • Howdy! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of
    my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this.

    I will forward this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read.
    Thank you for sharing!

    Reply
  • Thrilled to read why you are revisiting Blackmagic’s original 1080p Pocket Cinema Camera. The piece celebrates its compact charm, robust build, and film like color science that still resonates for indie shoots. Insightful reflections on workflow, RAW potential, and how nostalgic gear can sharpen modern storytelling. A thoughtful nod to budget friendly creativity and the lessons this camera teaches about lighting, exposure, and patience. A compelling read for filmmakers revisiting classic tools.

    Reply
  • J. Liu
    at

    Appreciate you writing this up in plain terms. Completely different topic, but Big Ambitions just went 1.0 and reworked its economy — worth noting for anyone still going off older guides.

    Reply
  • Good breakdown, learned something I didn’t expect. Slightly off-topic but I’ve been building out a small resource on Blood Dungeon roguelite dungeon crawler recently, still rough around the edges but growing.

    Reply
  • Angelo L. Luiz
    at

    That is thus gorgeous and also imaginative. I recently really like the particular shades and also anyone who receives that inside the email will probably be beaming. 주식디비

    Reply
  • The point about the Super 16 sensor never really being replaced is a good one – I still see DPs hanging onto old Pocket Cameras just for that look, updated 6K bodies or not. Slightly off topic, but a chunk of my own on-set tooling (batch renaming, LUT sorting scripts) ends up being small Python one-offs, so I wrote up some notes on using terminal-based AI coding assistants for that kind of workflow scripting: https://www.openaitoolshub.org/en/blog/opencode-review-terminal-ai-coding – might be useful if you ever automate parts of your ingest process.

    Reply
  • Angelo L. Luiz
    at

    I just found this blog and have high hopes for it to continue. Keep up the great work, its hard to find good ones. I have added to my favorites. Thank You. 코인디비

    Reply
  • Krea
    at

    Clear write-up — it stays practical instead of drowning in theory. krea 2 image generator

    Reply
  • Nice breakdown. Ai Photo Enhancer helped me understand astrocarto in more depth.

    Reply
  • Thanks for the insights. Ai Photo Enhancer was a useful read alongside your points on matrix destiny.

    Reply
  • Really enjoyed reading this detailed guide about Why I Am Revisiting Blackmagic’s Original (1080p) Pocket Cinema Camera! The insights and perspectives shared here are super practical. For anyone exploring creative photo tools and AI styling, AI Clothes Changer is also a fantastic resource worth checking out.

    Reply
  • Angelo L. Luiz
    at

    Pleasant write-up, it is an incredibly trendy blog site that you’ve got in this article, sustain the favorable do the job, will likely be returning. 대출디비

    Reply
  • Miles
    at

    The alphabet is a useful starting point, but learners benefit most when they can move between a reference chart and a real example. Looking up a letter explains its pattern; converting a short phrase shows how those patterns are separated and combined. A well-organized morse code alphabet should include letters, digits, and relevant punctuation, with each entry easy to compare against a conversion result. Audio is also valuable for illustrating that Morse is a timed signal system, not merely a collection of written symbols.

    Reply
  • Ha
    at

    animal symbol copy and paste

    Reply
  • https://sites.google.com/view/kalkulatorstau/
    Uwa?am, ?e ta strona jest naprawd? pomocna, bo wszystko pozostaje proste i praktyczne. Informacje s? ?atwe do zrozumienia, a ca?o?? wygl?da jak narz?dzie do codziennego u?ytku.

    Reply
  • The original Pocket Camera’s Super 16 sensor has this gorgeous, organic look that modern cameras just can’t quite fake. It’s a bummer nobody’s making that format anymore! On a totally different creative kick, I’ve been messing around with Gesture Synth — a free browser instrument where you literally wave your hands at your webcam to make music. No cables, no gear, just you conducting air symphonies. Surprisingly therapeutic after a day of pixel-peeping. 🎹✨

    Reply
  • Angelo L. Luiz
    at

    including reasonable comments here… 주식디비

    Reply
  • Completely with you on the Super 16 sensor being the point rather than the resolution. What keeps me on the original Pocket is that 1080p ProRes off that sensor holds a grade better than a lot of 4K coming off larger, noisier chips — you’re not upscaling, but you’re not oversampling either, and the noise stays filmic instead of turning to mush. Battery life is still the real tax, and I’d add that a Speedbooster changes the character enough that it’s almost a different camera. Aside: I batch-generate the thumbnail variants for my own posts now instead of building each one, the setup I use.

    Reply
  • Haber {https://anlik24.com.tr}

    Reply
  • The original Pocket Camera’s Super 16 sensor really does have a unique organic look that’s hard to replicate. It’s a shame no new cameras offer that native format. For a different kind of creative freedom, I’ve been experimenting with the gesture synth, which lets me control music with hand movements—no gear needed, just a webcam.

    Reply
  • Appreciation to my father who shared with me regarding this blog, this webpage is truly awesome.

    Reply
  • The comparison between the original Pocket Cinema Camera and newer 4K/6K models makes a convincing case that sensor character and portability can matter more than headline specifications. The discussion of Super 16 as both an aesthetic and a practical format is especially useful, since the smaller setup enabled a kind of independent, run-and-gun filmmaking that a crop mode alone cannot recreate. That broader idea—choosing a focused tool around the experience you actually want—also applies to digital resources for other creative hobbies. For players planning character routes and endings in Date Everything!, this focused English walkthrough covers locations, beginner guidance, and love, friendship, and hate outcomes.

    Date Everything Guide
    Official website:
    https://dateeverythingguide.online/

    Reply
  • Theo
    at

    Symbols are often treated as decoration, yet they also carry structural meaning. A middle dot can make compact labels easier to scan by separating related items without adding a full sentence break. That makes it useful in metadata, navigation trails, and short feature lists. The important distinction is choosing a real text character rather than an image or improvised spacing, because text remains searchable, selectable, and easier to reuse across different editors and devices.

    Reply
  • Liam
    at

    Many software issues become harder because instructions jump straight to a fix without explaining what to verify first. A better guide names the visible symptom, gives a short checklist of likely causes, and makes the expected result of each step clear. This is particularly helpful for login issues, where account status, network access, browser settings, and verification prompts can produce similar-looking failures. Readers can then troubleshoot methodically instead of repeating the same action.

    Reply
  • Carlos
    at

    Decorative Unicode text works best as a small visual accent rather than a replacement for ordinary writing. Keeping the main message in plain characters makes it easier to read, copy, search, and understand across devices. For a username, a heading, or a short social caption, letras cursivas can provide contrast while leaving the rest of the content clear enough for people who use smaller screens or assistive technology.

    Reply
  • Mason
    at

    Small teams often need HR information that is practical enough to apply immediately, not just a summary of regulations or software features. Clear checklists for hiring steps, payroll handoffs, review conversations, and recordkeeping can help owners turn broad responsibilities into repeatable routines. Folio HR is useful in that context because its resource approach keeps these connected topics accessible without assuming a dedicated HR department.

    Reply
  • Ren
    at

    A focused online timer can be especially useful when the interface keeps the essential controls visible: set a duration, start it, pause when interrupted, and reset for the next task. Support for hours, minutes, and seconds covers both quick breaks and longer work blocks. An end sound is also a simple but important cue, since it lets people step away from the screen without losing track of time.

    Reply
  • Diego
    at

    The point about revisiting an older camera is a useful corrective to spec-sheet thinking. Resolution and sensor size can matter, but they do not erase the character of a smaller-format image or the value of a familiar tool. The original Pocket Camera’s connection to the Super 16 aesthetic gives the discussion a clearer creative frame: choosing gear can begin with the image one wants to make, then work backward to the technical requirements. Restraint is often a more revealing test than novelty.

    Reply
  • Mateo
    at

    Natural-sounding AI-assisted writing is most useful when it supports a deliberate revision process. An AI humanizer can help make wording smoother across several languages, but the final editor still needs to verify meaning, facts, and audience fit. Keeping those responsibilities separate avoids confusing fluent phrasing with reliable content. For teams handling drafts in more than one language, a simple review checklist can keep terminology, tone, and intended message aligned before publication.

    Reply
  • Javier
    at

    For a one-time document task, account creation can add more effort than the task itself. Offering a path sin registro is useful when someone needs to prepare a file quickly for an email, form, or storage limit. It also reduces the number of services tied to a person’s identity and inbox. Combined with processing in the browser, that approach keeps the focus on a narrow, understandable job: making a PDF easier to share or submit.

    Reply
  • Oliver
    at

    A repeatable SEO content workflow needs more than draft generation. It should make the status of each topic clear, allow people to refine the article, and distinguish material that is merely prepared from material that has been approved for publication. Connecting those steps can reduce context switching for site operators while leaving the final editorial and publishing choices visible to the team.

    Reply
  • Lucas
    at

    The appeal here is less about treating age as a virtue than about choosing a tool whose constraints support a particular image. A 1080p camera with a smaller sensor can still be the more intentional choice when the goal is a Super 16 character rather than maximum resolution or shallow depth of field. That distinction is useful because camera discussions often collapse technical progress into a single direction. Revisiting older gear can clarify which visual decisions come from the camera itself and which come from lighting, lenses, framing, and postproduction. The original Pocket’s continued relevance seems to rest on that focus: it offers a specific texture instead of trying to be everything. authenticity matters more than novelty in that kind of decision.

    Reply
  • Haruto
    at

    The distinction here is not simply old versus new, but whether a camera’s particular image character serves the project. A smaller sensor and 1080p workflow can be limitations in some productions, yet they can also support a deliberate visual language when the Super 16 aesthetic is the goal. That framing is useful because it shifts the choice away from specification lists and toward texture, framing, and the practical needs of the shoot. The original Pocket remains interesting precisely because it did not follow every prevailing trend.

    Reply
  • https://www.spottheluxe.com
    I found this page surprisingly useful because it keeps everything simple and practical. The information is easy to understand, and it feels like a tool made for real everyday use.

    Reply
  • I still drag out my old Pocket Camera for short projects — something I tried last month actually surprised me with how good the skintones looked next to a newer Sony. The 1080p limit is a pain for delivery specs, but for web stuff it holds up way better than I expected.

    Reply
  • Solid article. For anyone interested in paper-banana, Ai Photo Enhancer is worth a look too.

    Reply
  • My friends and I often exchange recommendations about interesting games we discover online, and during one of our recent conversations, Table Game Online came up naturally while discussing different ways people enjoy digital entertainment.

    Reply
  • esse site é confiável. jogo crash é real. F12

    Reply
  • Fala, pessoal. Já testei no tigrinho com gerenciar bankroll mas depende do timing.

    Reply
  • Ai Photo Enhancer is a fast and easy AI-powered photo enhancement tool.

    Reply
  • The night-shift nurse stopped playing Lucky Neko after the Q1 patch. Came back last week. Different game now, he says.

    Reply
  • jktwin
    at

    It’s fascinating to see you revisit the original Pocket Cinema Camera! Your insights into its enduring relevance and unique characteristics really resonate. I’d love to hear more about how you find it compares to newer models in practical settings. Thanks for sharing your perspective!

    Reply
  • linitoto

    Reply
  • Great post! I’ve been checking this blog regularly, and I’m really impressed. The information is very helpful.photo enhancer online

    Reply
  • rankvelocity.click – Mobile version looks perfect; no glitches, fast scrolling, crisp text.

    Reply
  • trafficpath.click – Pages loaded fast, images appeared sharp, and formatting stayed consistent.

    Reply
  • webtrafficpro.click – Color palette felt calming, nothing distracting, just focused, thoughtful design.

    Reply
  • trafficlogic.click – Loved the layout today; clean, simple, and genuinely user-friendly overall.

    Reply
  • growthsystems.click – Appreciate the typography choices; comfortable spacing improved my reading experience.

    Reply
  • El respeto empieza por uno mismo, aprende a exigirlo con elegancia descargando este material, descubre las claves para mandar a la media cualquier trato indigno de forma educada y firme, estableciendo un estándar alto en tus relaciones. https://comomandaralamediadeformaeducadapdf.cyou/ Como Mandar A La Media De Forma Educada Opiniones

    Reply
  • digitalgrowthhq.click – Loved the layout today; clean, simple, and genuinely user-friendly overall.

    Reply
  • marketingdrive.click – Navigation felt smooth, found everything quickly without any confusing steps.

    Reply
  • rankvelocity.click – Overall, professional vibe here; trustworthy, polished, and pleasantly minimal throughout.

    Reply
  • searchcommand.click – Pages loaded fast, images appeared sharp, and formatting stayed consistent.

    Reply
  • digitalreach.click – Mobile version looks perfect; no glitches, fast scrolling, crisp text.

    Reply
  • Excellent post. I absolutely love this website. Thanks!

    Reply
  • **hepatoburn**

    hepatoburn is a potent, plant-based formula created to promote optimal liver performance and naturally stimulate fat-burning mechanisms.

    Reply
  • **hepato burn**

    hepato burn is a potent, plant-based formula created to promote optimal liver performance and naturally stimulate fat-burning mechanisms.

    Reply
  • **potent stream**

    potent stream is engineered to promote prostate well-being by counteracting the residue that can build up from hard-water minerals within the urinary tract.

    Reply
  • **prostabliss**

    prostabliss is a carefully developed dietary formula aimed at nurturing prostate vitality and improving urinary comfort.

    Reply
  • **energeia**

    energeia is the first and only recipe that targets the root cause of stubborn belly fat and Deadly visceral fat.

    Reply
  • Get Your Social Account’s Followers And Likes At One Place, Instantly. Save time managing your social account in one panel. Where people buy SMM services such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Tiktok, Soundcloud, and many more. Official Website: https://bit.ly/smmhalo

    Reply
  • Cibai
    There’s definately a lot to find out about this topic.
    I like all the points you made.

    Reply
  • https://loveshop1300.shop We are back! ?? ????? ? ????!

    Reply
  • Электрокарниз — это идеальное решение для вашего дома, которое позволяет легко управлять шторами с помощью пульта.
    Одним из самых актуальных устройств для управления шторами является электрокарниз.

    Reply
  • Рулонные шторы с электроприводом — это идеальное решение для создания уюта и комфорта в вашем доме, позволяющее управлять светом и приватностью с помощью простого нажатия кнопки.
    Рулонные шторы с электроприводом становятся все более популярными. Эти изделия представляют собой современное решение для оформления окон. Функциональность и удобство использования выделяют их среди других вариантов.

    Ключевым достоинством является возможность дистанционного управления шторами. Благодаря этому вы сможете легко настраивать уровень света в комнате. С его помощью можно программировать автоматическое открытие и закрытие штор.

    Монтаж рулонных штор с электроприводом осуществляется достаточно быстро. Вам потребуется минимальный набор инструментов и немного времени. Выбор из множества дизайнов и материалов дает возможность подобрать идеальный вариант для любого стиля.

    Рулонные шторы с электроприводом гарантируют защиту от солнечного света и обеспечивают стиль. С помощью различных тканей можно регулировать уровень затемнения. Таким образом, вы сможете создать комфортную атмосферу в своем доме.

    Reply
  • Thanks for the article. Here’s more on the topic https://ancientcivs.ru/

    Reply
  • Гидроизоляция зданий https://gidrokva.ru и сооружений любой сложности. Фундаменты, подвалы, крыши, стены, инженерные конструкции.

    Reply
  • ランジェリー ショップOne solution may be the innovative West Africa Archipelago cruises that Hurtigruten Expeditions aims to launch in November These two-week trips,aboard the line’s 180-passenger Spitsbergen,

    Reply
  • Always eagerly awaiting your next post Regards from IDProperticom

    Reply
  • Terima kasih atas artikel yang menarik ini. Salam kenal dari : IDProperti.com | Pasang Iklan Properti Gratis

    Reply
  • Setiap paragraf dalam artikel ini menunjukkan kecermatan dan dedikasi Anda dalam menyajikan informasi yang berkualitas. Saya sangat mengapresiasi bagaimana Anda menguraikan topik dengan sangat mendetail dan menarik. Ini benar-benar bacaan yang luar biasa. Terima kasih telah berbagi pengetahuan berharga. Salamat, Pasang Iklan Properti Gratis

    Reply
  • Darryl Kesslar
    at

    LUT?
    Once again playing with some footage from my BMPCC and darned if I can find a LUT designed for footage shot with ‘film’ look on…. Any links?

    Reply
  • I filmed all these videos with the Pocket Cinema Camera. I love it! https://www.jdanielramos.com/#!/pages/video

    Reply
  • Jace
    at

    Hey Noam,

    Was just about to sell my BMPCC gen1 but came across your post and am reconsidering.

    What are your favorite lenses for this camera?

    Thanks!
    Jace

    Reply
    • The Veydra lenses are a great pair! Or the Voigtlanders.

      Reply
    • pavel
      at

      If you end up selling, let me know 🙂

      Reply
  • Benno
    at

    The Blackmagic Pocket Gen 1 is an absolute secret and I own 2 of them. How did you solve the battery problem? I always film only with a tripod and connected power supply.

    Ben

    Reply
    • I don’t use it all that often (as much as I do love it), but if I did I would probably just mount a V-Mount to the bottom.

      Reply
  • Michael Israel
    at

    I bought a couple of used bmpcc og cameras off of eBay along with vintage cinema lenses for 16mm cameras so now I got vintage cooke lenses and schneider lenses and vintage Kodak 16mm cine lenses for under 2k so I can get the 16mm look when I want it and I have a bmpcc 4k when I need a more modern look. I love the cinema dng and I wish that blackmagic design would add cinema dng back on to my pocket 4k

    Reply
  • […] A used OG BMPCC one can run you about $500. Credit score: Noam Kroll […]

    Reply
  • Automatisator
    at

    I love the little Arri Alexa!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEVyLshdiWY

    Reply
  • Hi Noam, thanks for the work you do in our community – you’re much appreciated by many of us!
    Love the fact that you’re playing with the original BMPCC again and wanted to let you know about a short I’ve just shot with it. I single-handedly wrote and shot an entire narrative short film during the first lockdown, all in my house, starring only my mum, with no crew, no actors, and no idea how it’d turn out. A one-person crew (me), and one-mother cast. A unique experiment featuring my poor mum, who’s never acted, and a very, very unlikely hero…
    Would love to know what a pro like yourself thinks if you get a chance to watch it! https://youtu.be/SBwje8EDl84

    Reply
    • Really appreciate the feedback, Sandeep. I will check this out soon! Thanks so much.

      Reply
  • Kevin
    at

    Hey Noam,
    I currently shoot 16mm film pretty exclusively (I direct music videos). I’m interested in giving the og bmpcc a try but can’t find any good raw footage to test grades on. Are you able to upload a few minutes of footage?

    Reply
    • I don’t have any easily accessible right now, but will aim to post some in the future if I can!

      Reply
  • Jack Price
    at

    I love that this thread just keeps on giving! I keep looking at other options but owning both the BMPCC and BMMCC I just love this sensor and I am tempted to get a back up!
    On multiple exports to DCP for short films it is a winning combination. I love the way sensor works with RAW and ProRes, on a cinema screen (remember those?) it delivers the emotional response I got off 35mm but for peanuts. Side by side it wouldn’t compare, but in its one right I have witnessed audiences stunned by the story and the sensor.
    I often just need an extra camera for high
    ISO shooting or maybe just a bigger light. Time to get a Dino!

    Reply
    • Same here! Seems like a lot of us are still in love with this little camera. I’m trying out the new Pocket Pro next week, curious to see how it goes. Will share thoughts here on the blog.

      Reply
      • Gabor
        at

        I built a complete digital 16mm camera system around my Blackmagic Micro, and I really like it! I will use it for a long time for sure.

        Reply
  • I’m just in the process of rigging up an OG BMPCC, after finishing a series of kids shorts on Reg / Double Super 8.
    This article is what inspired me.. after refusing to shoot digital for so long.
    I was shooting Fomapan R100, having it processed, and self scanning with a diy setup using a Nikon D5200.
    The result is what you’d think, complete with 8 bit artifacting, banding etc, but it told the story.
    Am looking forward to seeing how far RAW can be stretched!
    Thanks for a great article.

    Reply
    • That’s awesome, Ruben. Thanks for the note and hope to see you around the site soon!

      Reply
  • Jason
    at

    Have you looked at the Blackmagic Ursa Broadcast camera? They still make it and is a Super 16 sensor in an Ursa with lens mounts you can switch out. Some people have been using it with old, but stellar Zeiss DigiPrimes. The camera is reasonably priced for what it is.

    Also, Angelbird makes cards for BMPCC OG and Micro they guarantee will work. Not cheap, but work great.

    Reply
    • Hadn’t thought about the broadcast, but that’s a great suggestion.

      Reply
  • I routinely still use the original Pocket Camera as a close up camera to compliment my URSA 4.6k which I use to capture wide and mid shots. The original Pocket has perhaps the most film-like image of any of the BM cameras and perhaps the most film-like of any camera to date. That perception hit me like a ton of bricks after I had just gotten the then new GH4. By comparison, it just didn’t have that “film” look. The Pocket Camera just has an organic soul. I’m thinking of selling my original 2.5k but I’ll never sell my Pocket Camera!

    Reply
  • […] thing I always liked about the original 16mm Pocket Camera was the filmic quality the images had straight off the camera. To my eye at least, that […]

    Reply
  • cyrus
    at

    Hi Noam. Your post reminded me of a nagging question I have that I have never really found an answer for. The first camera I ever had was a very obsolete camera called an NX100 (with an anti alising filter built in) by samsung with a APS C sensor /15mpx with interchangable lens mount. – I shot my first feature on it using a super tak 28mm on a few hundred bucks (edited to 30mins to make it watchable! lol) but I was captivated by it’s look. It had a character that was filmic but also it’s own too – however it was really hard in post dealing with any poor exposure- but when it was good i loved the look. The bit rate is very low and Ive been discouraged to go anywhere near it on the next film which I get, (I’m working with 16mm and 8mm at the mo- your posts are invaluable on this btw!)- but if I really got the exposure under control could you (in your opinion) ever get funding and take a camera like this to a serious release in this day and age without playing the experimental card. Thanks! c .g ;-)..

    Reply
    • You could absolutely release a film shot on virtually any camera in this day and age. That said, you are probably more likely to release a film shot on a more traditional cinema camera (at least statistically). But a great movie is a great movie, and if the story/acting/editing/cinematography are all top notch, no one will care what it was shot on.

      Reply
  • Rich
    at

    hi there – working on my own indy – due to low/non existant budget i had to do the homework – bolex was a dream… I just wish I bought it for my own when had chance:( – nevertheless – my use and reasons:

    – bmpcc 4k – night shots (that can’t be shot during the day and graded to night), slowmo (for the reasons I can’t comprehend)

    – bmpcc (original) – for all the rest – why?

    I was so impressed by the images it produced I smomehow now own 3 of them:) And I don’t mean the beautifly milky, film like pictures (will get back to this with sensor) but the ability to grade. Forget the prores (kills the camera, kills the PC, looks and grades rubbish) – CinemaDNG on the other hand is withsanding heavy grading wonderfly (12bit). Don’t get me wrong – comparing to, for instance, Arri Classic (1080p) that I can’t forget playing with – it’s not really close… but same leauge… especially after pro grading (no dslr that comes remotely close I came across – no matter the price)

    The sensor – it’s old fairchild where blackmagic and their CEO (admire the guy and his approach) wanted the sensor to get EVERYTHING it’s pointed at. There were probably 2 ways – get the bigger size, or enlarge the light sensitive spots on it – and make sure it catches all those photons the way we see them (no sharpening and witchery). Call me crazy but years go I did the math for the sensor – ca. 14,5 DYNAMIC RANGE!! understood why the pictures look so good

    There is no alternative on the market – unless you have $$$, or balls to rent:)

    It’s a great camera in 2020. You don’t need 4k (cinema theaters get max. 2k, most 1080p) – if someone asks for it – upscale it – no one will notice after tiny tweaks (it records everything – there is plenty of detail to play with – it’s not dslr/phone etc. with its sharpening like crazy mode always on).

    I would made a bet 10 years ago that we will now have HDR (10bit) as standard in cinema and homes- now I’m not sure we will get there in 10 years time – netflix/prime/hbo/yt stream at very low data rates…. and the results are unfortunately there on the screen – all the cinema knowledge down the drain…. it’s difficult time for purists

    The drawbacks:
    – power consumption ( no wonder with those data rates)
    – working SD cards – I managed to get 3 (different types) for my cams (no wonder with those data rates)
    – cinema grade matte box with 4.56 filters look rediculusly big with it (although on plus side no one thinks of me as an amateur any more)
    – the proper screen for proper shots essential (small HDMI socket that needs special, special care)
    – 1 of my 3 talks to AF and stabilization of panasonic lens – doesn’t matter for cinematographers
    – the microphone is barely enough for sync in post
    – heavy IR polution, UV leaks when not filtered properly

    As I remember the alternatives for the buck that will utlize the magical sensor are BMD 2.5k, micro cinema, 4,6k. I think.

    its nearly 4am…my insomnia is back – sorry for its being soo long… glad found someone on my side of darkness
    regards
    Rich

    Reply
    • Thank you for this, Rich! Appreciate your insight and I’m sure others will learn from this too.

      Reply
  • Luis
    at

    I would really love to shoot a short film on the bmpcc since I own one. But mine gets hot and wouldn’t like to have overheating issues. Any input on this subject anyone?

    Reply
    • I have shot so many short films with this camera that I have lost count. Begin

      Reply
    • Never had mine overheat, but they do tend to get quite hot while shooting!

      Reply
      • Luis
        at

        Thank you !

        Reply
  • Why don’t go with BMMCC? Same sensor but more powerful hardware and better form factor for rigging. Both Micro and pocket needs OLPF/IR filter to shoot RAW and use all possible camera potential. There are also some custom-made accessories for this camera here https://lavky.com/radioproektor/ And large collection of BMMCC rigs to discover https://bmmccrigs.tumblr.com/

    Reply
    • I should have mentioned the micro cinema camera in this post. I own one and feel the same about it as I do the pocket – love the image from this thing!

      Reply
  • amazing Post ! and could not Agree more !

    This is a short film i’ve directed /shot / edited / colored recently . It was entirely filmed on the BMPCC for these same reasons . The 16 mm look

    link : https://vimeo.com/329013277

    Reply
    • WOW. That short looks ridiculous. Congrats.

      Reply
    • KJ
      at

      Just scrolling through here in 2022 reading all of the comments and clicking links. Clicked on this one and realized you’re one of the handful of people I’m already following on Vimeo! You nailed the 16mm look on this. Great work. I still love my BMPCC 🙂

      Reply
  • Klas
    at

    “I have long been a huge fan of the Super 16 look, and there were only really ever two cameras that could scratch that itch: The Digital Bolex and Blackmagic’s original Pocket Cinema Camera.”

    Have you seen the Ikonoskop A-cam DII ? That is what you are looking for. With a global shutter too.

    https://vimeo.com/search?q=ikonoskop+dii

    https://www.rawcinemashop.com/ikonoskop

    Reply
    • Haven’t shot with it, but you are tempting me to…

      Reply
  • Marina
    at

    Hello there – what about the storage issues with the huge difficulty to found an sd cards that works on bmpcc 1080p?
    What is your solution for it? Thank you

    Reply
    • Marc B.
      at

      The original BMPCC firmware is finicky about which SD cards it will accept, and it’s not just based on the rated speed. The Sandisk Extreme Pro 95 MB/s V30 “3” “10” cards below 256GB used to work fine, but compatibility is now dependent on the serial number. For up to date info, the Blackmagic message boards have steered me right, and I now buy largest sizes to also use w/my GH5. Card issues could cause shooters to prematurely mothball it.

      Reply
      • Definitely a concern – I’ve been using the same old cards with no issue, but certainly a concern for those purchasing new media.

        Reply
      • Id like to mention that there are excellent high capacity cheap sd cards available that work perfectly with raw recording on the pocket camera. Available on amazon and others, Kingston canvas react cards have been a lifesaver since I went back to the bmpcc after many years recently.

        Reply
      • Jason
        at

        Angelbird makes cards specifically for the original BMPCC and Micro for sometime now.

        Reply
    • I have been using Sandisk Extreme Pro I believe with no issue. Which cards are you using?

      Reply
      • Matias
        at

        Kingston canvas react work flawless. I use 64 and 128 gb on pro res and raw.
        Alwasys format card on camera before shoot.

        Reply
  • Zander
    at

    Hey there – totally agree with your views regarding the original BMPCC, beautiful little camera, often overlooked. We shot a feature film on it which released in US Theaters back in November and is now available on demand worldwide called COSMOS. Thought you might be interested in checking out the trailer or making of to see the little camera in action 🙂

    Reply
    • So great to hear! Yes, please share the trailer, would love to see it.

      Reply
    • Paul Kepner
      at

      I saw the movie and loved it! You guys did an amazing job and really showed what the little BMPCC is capable of.

      Reply
    • JAVO
      at

      Brothers, might you share how you exposed on the OG Pocket? Also, was it filmed in CinemaDNG or ProRes (if so, which flavourful…HQ?). Thanks!!!!

      Reply
      • I typically overexpose by about half a stop and shoot ProRes. That usually does the trick!

        Reply
  • jose
    at

    Hello ! do you have any thoughts on the Black Magic micro cinema camera? Thats the one I use now 🙂 I think it is still available.

    Reply
    • Yes! I would apply everything I said here to the micro cinema camera too. Especially in terms of image quality, as they are virtually identical. I only with the micro had a little LCD screen, but that’s easily solved.

      Reply
  • Steven
    at

    I’ve been watching your blog as I’m curious how you might be working with the Sigma FP for best results.

    And what a coincidence- maybe it’s the fact that the Sigma FP is pitting itself against the form factor of the old pocket -I’ve also just been revisiting the Original Pocket Cinema Camera. I did some unscientific test between the Original Pocket, Pocket 4k, and the Sigma FP.

    Here’s where I’m at with the cameras at the moment (personal observations):
    Original Pocket: best for lighting scenarios that are most similar to celluloid film, best of three for backlit and close ups…. EXCELLENT at dynamic range in the crossover between shadows and lights that is most common when shooting close on faces.

    Pocket 4K: Best for quick shooting/run and gun. Best for low light when paired with the Voigtländer MFT-mount lenses, city/building details, better for faces that can benefit from contrast don’t recommend on faces that are prone to dark circles under eyes as it will aggravate reddish/blue tints/contrast in those kinds of skin tones. Hasn’t done well in backlit scenarios for me and close ups. It has less dynamic range color detail on skin tone than the Original Pocket. In general the Pocket 4k gives off a muddier color ‘wash’ for close ups/medium shots with faces. So if I had both cameras on set, I’d use the Original for close ups /most mediums and switch to the 4K on wider shots when sharpness wins over color detail in faces/environment (if that plays well together, unsure if that’s realistic without further testing).

    Sigma FP: Because of it’s form factor, full frame view and dynamic range, I like it best for documentary/street photography (*turn off previews for fast shooting). Finally I have a digital camera I can walk around with that feels like shooting on 35mm or 120 film photo film cameras. I currently find shooting video mode on it overly complicated for a manual user. Hoping for firmware updates that make things better. It has a beautiful look for shooting tabletop content: color detail + sharpness + food = thumbs up. I don’t have the glass for the Sigma FP to be my lowlight camera of choice compared to my Pocket 4K.

    Reply
    • So funny to hear we are both on the same path! And thanks so much for sharing all this detail here, great observations and perspective all around.

      Reply
  • Tobias Manuel Fries
    at

    This was my first BMD camera I owned after using a HV20 HDV-Camera and a 550D before. Even though I own the Pocket 4K (a great and very versatile Camera, that can deliver beautiful images) I still use the original Pocket from time to time.

    I´m using a Viltrox Focal Reducer and EF-Lenses most of the time, it creates really nice colors and very organic motion, even though it is “only” 1080p (that you can transform in resolve via superscale and achieve some nice results). Unfortunately it doesn´t have the 3:1 Raw that the Micro Cinema Camera has and it is missing that 60p capability. But I will keep on using this camera, no doubt about that. After grading the CDNG´s I usually add some Grain in Resove and that´s it. If you need this 16mm- or vintage-film-Look, you´ll probably be much happier than if you´re using newer kinds of cameras.

    Reply
    • Great to hear, Tobias. And thanks for sharing your experience here – amazing how this little camera just keeps ticking!

      Reply
  • Luca D
    at

    I own the BMMCC and have been considering selling it… but something always holds me back.

    Reply
    • It’s the one camera I can’t bring myself to sell!

      Reply
  • This is a pretty funny coincidence. In the last few months, I started to think about a gear change/upgrade and my choice will probably be BMPCCK 6K plus a couple of Leica R lenses but I’m also thinking about investing on lenses only and renting the camera when I need it (you know, “Marry with lenses, engage with cameras”…).
    But as every filmmaker knows, sometimes it happens to get a gig with short notice so you don’t have the time to rent the gear.
    Sometimes it also happens to work on a low budget project or even on a personal project with no budget and for that reason, I’m seriously considering to buy a used original Pocket Cinema Camera: it’s cheap, it’s still a great camera, you can record internally on ProRes or Raw and it has a great color science… perfect (for my needs, of course).

    Reply
    • Awesome, Michelangelo. I know I’m replying late – but did you end up making a decision?

      Reply
      • I was about to do it but, you know, something unpredictable it’s happened to our planet, so it’s all frozen for now but it’s on my personal ‘back-to-life list’ for sure when this crazy period will end

        Reply
  • Pawel
    at

    Yeah, I was thinking about upgrading to bmpcc 4k, but after testing I found that something is missing in this image. So instead of a new pocket I bought the Micro 🙂 I have absolutely no complexes associated with it. I just love this image 🙂 Cheers

    Reply
    • Awesome! I love the micro, along with the original pocket it delivers some of the best images from Blackmagic in my opinion.

      Reply
      • Good message especially when I find myself on the verge of purchasing a 8k large format camera 🎥! You did forget to mention possibly the greatest yet strangest super 16 digital cinema camera the Ikonoskop A-Cam which I once had but sold for more supported options.

        Reply
        • Great addition! I still haven’t shot with that one, but have been meaning to. Thanks for the reminder.

          Reply
  • Piotr Naumowicz
    at

    I know what you feel. I’ve owned original BMCC and Micro Camera. Micro was one of my favourite cameras ever. The picture was nice and organic. You could use it super16 and/or add speedbooster for almost super35 look. The noise was there but it was organic and kinda nice. It was small and it had 1080 60p. I wish BM could just release the micro cinema camera with stabilization and build in flip out touch screen and Sony L batteries. I sold it some time ago, but this is the one I miss 🙂

    I’ve own and owned a few cameras and video shooting dslr bodies and some mirrorless too and if I can say something about specs is that they often make you want stuff you will not like. This was a case with my sony a7s it was nice on paper but in real life, it was not good photo nor video camera – not good enough. Similar thing with the xt3 – It ticks a lot of boxes and it is really close but every time I take my 5dmkIV instead xt3 I’m more happy with the results (for both photo and video). I think I will sell xt3. I also tried/owned/tested a few of cinema cameras. (BMCC, BMMCC, Pocket 4k, Poket 6k, Ursa Mini 4.6k, C200 and more.) I own c200 and pocket 6k now for the reason different than pure specs. I don’t want to make this comment all about the other cameras. What I want to say is: Specs are not as important as you may think. What’s matters is the image and how it feels in the end.

    And both the original pocket and micro camera haves something special. That secret sauce.
    Sometimes, simply: more is less. 🙂

    Reply
    • Piotr Naumowicz
      at

      or even less is more 🙂

      Reply
    • Florian
      at

      Are you aware of the fact that the Blackmagic Pocket 4K now has a S16 crop mode with 2.7K resolution, since the last firmware update?

      Reply
      • Michael
        at

        Which update is that?

        Reply
      • That’s a great feature – but I still find the image from the original pocket to render colors/contrast differently. Neither is better or worse, but they offer a different look.

        Reply
        • Sheridan
          at

          If the Pocket 4K/6K only did Pro Res then, yeah, sure you would have a point but they actually have RAW so a completely fresh image…..

          Reply
    • Such great points here, Piotr. Appreciate you sharing this! And I totally agree about the micro cinema camera, for me it’s virtually interchangeable with the original Pocket HD. The version you described would be a dream!

      Reply
    • Mike
      at

      I’m curious about your opinion on the xt3, as I recently read about it and thought it seemed really appealing on paper. What didn’t you like about it? I totally get what you say about how the “feeling” you get with a product and the results can be different than what pure specs would imply.

      (I’m not an experienced videographer or filmmaker, but an on and off hobby still photographer with some “ancient” canon gear like the 7D mk 1, a tiny Panasonic GM1 and some vintage film cameras like Zorki4, who is curious about getting back more into video. Maybe even shoot an artsy short film. 😀 Or just documenting the kids. Maybe shoot a concert video with my friends band.)

      Reply
      • Thanks for the note! There’s really nothing I can complain about with the XT3. It’s a great camera. I just didn’t really need it anymore as I have other cameras too, and I always like to experiment with new toys. But I still recommend it regularly to friends who I think it would work well for!

        Reply

Leave a Reply