Menu

Check Out My $0 Short Film “DOPAMINE” Shot On Ultra 16mm Film

Nearly a year ago I modified my Arri SRII film camera to Ultra 16mm, and set out to take some test shots with it. Instead of just capturing random images, I figured why not set up a little short film to see how the camera would perform on a “real” set.

As I wrote about in this article, the shoot was super unconventional and took place over just 6 hours. We intended to shoot two full 400ft rolls of 16mm film, but due to a technical issue could only shoot a single roll… Still, we managed to capture 90% of what was planned and ultimately get it in the can.

Then, I put the film on a shelf for a while as the pandemic had hit and other priorities took over. But I revisited the film in fall for a very quick post-production process, which I talk about in this blog post.

The film has been done for a while, but I’m just publishing it online now as things have been so busy over the past few months. In any case, if you’d like to watch the experiment, check it out below!

This is what $0, one can of film, and a few friends pulled together in 6 hours. If you enjoy the film, please “like” it on YouTube with a thumbs up so other people can find it too.

For more filmmaking articles every Sunday, sign up for my newsletter here.

About Author

Noam Kroll is an award-winning Los Angeles based filmmaker, and the founder of the boutique production house, Creative Rebellion. His work can be seen at international film festivals, on network television, and in various publications across the globe. Follow Noam on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook for more content like this!

13 Comments

  • Steve Buckingham
    at

    It seems from your earlier favourite U16 you’ve now prefer S16 with its various advantages.

    I’ve been disappointed that much of the history of U16 on the internet does not mention my late father’s invention of Varispect (then unpenned U16) in the early 50’s. It was also a precursor to S16 upon the uptake of single perf, so claims that Rune Ericson developed S16 would seem incorrect. The late Doug Palmers blogs on Cinematography.com cover a lot, and I’ve too been trying to see what recognition my father can get.

    One thing that recently occurred to me is why the lense needs recentering on an S16 conversion, given an adequate lense, viewfinder compensation, and appropriate intermediate scanning. Maybe panning distortion for one thing, but maybe even that could digitally corrected.

    I’ve been surprised by film movies continuing, and particularly 16mm, like one I stumbled upon recently on TV, How to Blow Up a Pipeline.

    Reply
  • Amazing work. I feel moved to get myself working thorough in film production.

    Reply
    • That’s awesome to hear. Glad you enjoyed it, Melik!

      Reply
  • NTENI
    at

    +1

    film is fantastic
    makes such a difference

    Reply
  • Thanks for sharing this! I liked the lack of dialogue and ultimate message about the dopamine effect of smart phones. Short and to the point with a strong message that’s not delivered on the nose (excuse the pun).

    Reply
  • Harry
    at

    Nice short film. Quality is key too

    Reply
  • Jeremy Evan Taylor
    at

    Very well done, Noam. I agree with the message and I like how the short was an example of how to “show, don’t tell”. There is just something about 16mm (standard, super or ultra) that sucks you in and is so much more interesting to watch than the super clean, overly sharp look that the newer cameras produce. Gave a thumbs up on Youtube. Cheers!

    Reply
    • Thanks a lot, Jeremy! And I totally agree about 16mm… It just makes everything look better.

      Reply
  • sean o deadaigh
    at

    Nice one Noam. liked the concept and loved the look. BRAVO

    Reply

Leave a Reply